An Expert Report on the Concept of Retirement Age in Texas: A Comprehensive Legal and Regulatory Analysis

Introduction

The question of retirement age in Texas does not have a single, simple answer.

There is no state or federal law that mandates a universal retirement age for the vast majority of workers.

Instead, the concept of “retirement age” is a complex intersection of eligibility criteria for various income streams, legal protections against age-based discrimination, and specific regulations governing access to personal savings.

For any Texas resident, determining their personal retirement timeline requires a nuanced understanding of four distinct but interconnected pillars: federal entitlement programs like Social Security; state and local public pension systems; federal and state age discrimination laws; and the rules governing private retirement accounts such as 401(k)s and IRAs.

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of these four pillars to demystify the concept of retirement age in Texas.

The objective is to equip individuals with an authoritative framework for understanding their options, rights, and obligations.

The analysis will proceed logically, beginning with the universal federal systems that apply to nearly all workers, then moving to the specific and intricate pension systems for Texas public employees.

Subsequently, the report will examine the crucial legal protections that grant workers the right to choose when to retire, followed by an analysis of the rules for accessing personal retirement funds.

By deconstructing this topic into its core components, this report will provide a clear and definitive guide to navigating the path to retirement in Texas.

---

Part I: The Federal Framework: Social Security and Age-Based Benefits

The Social Security system provides the foundational layer of retirement income for most working Americans, including those in Texas.

The age at which an individual chooses to claim these benefits has a profound and permanent impact on their monthly income.

The Social Security Administration (SSA) has established a detailed framework of rules based on an individual’s birth year, which creates powerful financial incentives that shape retirement decisions.

Section 1.1: Determining Your Full Retirement Age (FRA)

The cornerstone of the Social Security system is the concept of “Full Retirement Age,” or FRA.

This is the specific age at which an individual is entitled to receive 100% of their primary insurance amount (PIA), which is the benefit calculated from their lifetime earnings history.¹

FRA is not a fixed number; it is determined by one’s year of birth.

Due to legislative changes enacted to account for increasing life expectancies, the FRA has been gradually increasing.

For individuals born between 1943 and 1954, the FRA is 66.

For those born in 1955, it is 66 and 2 months, and it continues to increase by two-month increments for each subsequent birth year until it reaches 67 for everyone born in 1960 or later.²

This tiered system makes it essential for individuals to identify their specific FRA to understand their benefit calculations.

A special rule applies to individuals born on the first of any month; the SSA treats them as if they were born in the previous month, which can affect their FRA.¹

For example, a person born on January 1, 1960, would have their FRA calculated as if they were born in 1959, which is 66 and 10 months, not 67.

The following table provides a clear reference for determining one’s FRA based on their birth year.

Table 1.1: Social Security Full Retirement Age (FRA) by Birth Year

Year of Birth	Full Retirement Age (FRA)
1943-1954	66
1955	66 and 2 months
1956	66 and 4 months
1957	66 and 6 months
1958	66 and 8 months
1959	66 and 10 months
1960 and later	67

Source: Social Security Administration ²

Section 1.2: The Legal and Financial Implications of Early Retirement

The SSA allows individuals to begin collecting retirement benefits as early as age 62.¹

However, this choice comes with a significant and, crucially,

permanent reduction in the monthly benefit amount.⁴

This is not a temporary penalty that disappears upon reaching FRA; the lower payment amount persists for the rest of the retiree’s life.

The reduction is calculated on a monthly basis using a two-tiered formula.

For the first 36 months immediately preceding an individual’s FRA, the benefit is reduced by $5/9$ of $1\%$ for each month.

For any month beyond the initial 36, the reduction is $5/12$ of $1\%$ per month.⁴

To illustrate, consider an individual with an FRA of 67 who decides to claim benefits at age 62.

This is 60 months early.

• The first 36 months result in a reduction of $36 \times (5/9 \times 0.01) = 0.20$, or $20\%$.
• The remaining 24 months result in a reduction of $24 \times (5/12 \times 0.01) = 0.10$, or $10\%$.
• The total reduction is $20\% + 10\% = 30\%$. This person will receive only $70\% of their full retirement benefit for the rest of their life.²

The reduction is even more pronounced for spousal benefits.

A spouse is generally entitled to a benefit of up to $50\% of the primary worker’s full benefit amount.

However, if that spouse claims early, their benefit is also reduced.

For a worker with an FRA of 67, a spouse who begins collecting benefits at age 62 will receive only $32.5\% of the worker’s full benefit, not the maximum $50\%.²

Section 1.3: The Financial Advantages of Delayed Retirement

Just as claiming early reduces benefits, delaying benefits beyond FRA increases them.

The SSA incentivizes delayed retirement through a system of Delayed Retirement Credits (DRCs).¹

These credits are earned for each month an individual is eligible for benefits but forgoes claiming them, from their FRA up until age 70.⁶

For anyone born in 1943 or later, the rate of increase is $8\% per year, which translates to $2/3$ of $1\%$ for each month of delay.²

This increase is applied to the individual’s full retirement benefit amount.

The accrual of these credits stops automatically at age 70, meaning there is no further financial advantage from the SSA for delaying claims past this age.⁸

For an individual with an FRA of 67, delaying benefits for three years until age 70 results in a $24\% increase ($3 \text{ years} \times 8\%/\text{year}).

Their monthly benefit will be $124\% of their full retirement amount, a substantial increase that also serves as the new, higher base for all future cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs).⁵

These credits apply only to the worker’s own benefit and do not increase spousal benefits.⁴

The decision of when to claim Social Security is a critical financial choice, balancing the desire for earlier income against the promise of larger future payments.

The system is designed to be roughly “actuarially neutral,” meaning that over an average lifespan, the total lifetime benefits received should be similar regardless of claiming age.

However, this neutrality does not account for individual circumstances.

The data reveals that a large percentage of Americans—$47\% of recent retirees—claim benefits between the ages of 62 and 64, despite the significant financial reduction.⁵

This indicates that for many, factors such as personal health, job loss, the need for immediate income, or a desire to exit the workforce outweigh the pure financial optimization of delaying benefits.⁴

The system’s structure, therefore, does more than just provide income; it establishes a decision-making framework where the “penalty” for early retirement can be viewed as the price paid for liquidity and freedom from work, while the “reward” for delaying is compensation for continued labor and deferred consumption.

Section 1.4: Critical Ancillary Considerations: Medicare and Family Benefits

The decision of when to claim Social Security is intertwined with other crucial considerations, most notably Medicare.

It is imperative for individuals to enroll in Medicare when they first become eligible, which is typically at age 65, regardless of their employment status or when they plan to start receiving Social Security checks.¹

Delaying Medicare enrollment can lead to permanent late-enrollment penalties on premiums for Part B (medical insurance) and Part D (prescription drug coverage), as well as potentially significant gaps in health coverage.⁶

Furthermore, the retirement decision can affect the entire family.

Certain family members may be eligible for benefits based on a worker’s record, including spouses age 62 or older, spouses of any age caring for a child under 16, unmarried children up to age 18 (or 19 if a full-time student), and unmarried adult children disabled before age 22.²

The timing of the primary worker’s claim can influence the amount and availability of these ancillary benefits, adding another layer of complexity to the retirement planning process.

---

Part II: Retirement Systems for Texas Public Employees

While Social Security provides a federal baseline, a significant portion of the Texas workforce is covered by state-administered public pension plans.

These systems have their own distinct and often complex sets of rules for retirement eligibility that are separate from Social Security.

For public employees, “retirement age” is primarily defined by their specific pension plan’s criteria, which typically involve a combination of age and years of service.

Section 2.1: The Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS)

The Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) is a large, defined-benefit pension plan that covers most employees of Texas public schools, colleges, and universities.⁹

As a defined-benefit plan, a retiree’s annuity is not based on their contribution amount but is instead calculated using a formula that considers their years of service credit and an average of their highest annual salaries.¹¹

The central concept for TRS retirement eligibility is the “Rule of 80,” which is met when a member’s age plus their years of service credit equals or exceeds 80.¹²

However, eligibility for full, unreduced benefits under this rule is not uniform.

It is strictly dictated by a tiered system based on when a member joined TRS and their service history, making it one of the most complex aspects of retirement planning for Texas educators.¹⁴

• Tier 1 (Legacy Members): Members who entered TRS-covered service before September 1, 2007, and had accrued at least five years of service credit by August 31, 2014, are eligible for full, unreduced retirement benefits as soon as they meet the Rule of 80, with no minimum age requirement.¹⁵
• Tier 2 (Intermediate Members): Members who entered between September 1, 2007, and August 31, 2014, must meet the Rule of 80 and be at least age 60 to receive full benefits. If they retire under the Rule of 80 before reaching age 60, their annuity is permanently reduced by $5\% for each year they are under 60.¹²
• Tier 3 (Newer Members): Members who entered on or after September 1, 2014, or who had fewer than five years of service credit on that date, face the strictest requirements. They must meet the Rule of 80 and be at least age 62 to receive full benefits. Retiring under the Rule of 80 before age 62 results in a permanent $5\% reduction for each year they are under 62.¹²
• Grandfathered Status: Special, more lenient rules apply to members who were “grandfathered” as of August 31, 2005, by meeting certain criteria (e.g., being at least age 50, having 25 years of service, or meeting a “Rule of 70”).¹⁶ These members often retain eligibility for unreduced benefits at earlier ages.
• Alternative Pathway: Across all tiers, a member may also retire with full benefits at age 65, provided they have at least five years of service credit.¹³

A critical distinction exists between eligibility for a pension and eligibility for retiree health insurance, known as TRS-Care.

The requirements for TRS-Care are generally more stringent.

To qualify, a retiree must typically have at least 10 years of TRS service credit and either meet the Rule of 80 or have 30 years of service.¹⁵

This creates a potential “gap” where an educator may be eligible to retire with a pension but not yet be eligible for the associated health insurance, a crucial financial consideration.

The following matrix consolidates the complex TRS rules into a single reference.

Table 2.1: TRS Normal Retirement Eligibility Matrix

TRS Member Tier / Status	Requirement for Full Pension	Minimum Age for Full Pension (Under Rule of 80)	Early Retirement Penalty (Under Rule of 80)	Requirement for TRS-Care
Tier 1: Entered before 9/1/2007 (with 5+ yrs credit on 8/31/14)	Age 65 with 5+ yrs service OR meet Rule of 80	None	N/A	10+ yrs service AND meet Rule of 80 OR 30+ yrs service
Tier 2: Entered 9/1/2007 – 8/31/2014 (with 5+ yrs credit on 8/31/14)	Age 65 with 5+ yrs service OR meet Rule of 80	60	$5\% reduction per year under age 60	10+ yrs service AND meet Rule of 80 OR 30+ yrs service
Tier 3: Entered on/after 9/1/2014 (or <5 yrs credit on 8/31/14)	Age 65 with 5+ yrs service OR meet Rule of 80	62	$5\% reduction per year under age 62	10+ yrs service AND meet Rule of 80 OR 30+ yrs service

Source: Teacher Retirement System of Texas, Texas Classroom Teachers Association ¹²

Section 2.2: The Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS)

The Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS) is the primary retirement plan for employees of Texas state agencies and certain higher education institutions.¹⁸

Similar to TRS, ERS eligibility rules are tiered based on an employee’s hire date, and there is a critical distinction between eligibility for a monthly annuity and eligibility for retiree health insurance.¹⁸

For many ERS members, particularly those hired before September 1, 2009, meeting the Rule of 80 with at least 10 years of service credit is the standard path to retiring with both a lifetime annuity and access to retiree health insurance.

However, the rules are complex.

For example, some employees may be eligible to receive a lifetime payment at age 60 with 10 years of service, but they may have to wait until age 65 to enroll in the health insurance plan.¹⁸

For employees hired more recently, the requirements to secure health insurance benefits in retirement have become more stringent, often requiring more years of service.¹⁸

The ERS framework also includes distinct rules for specific employee groups, such as Law Enforcement and Custodial Officers (LECOS), Elected State Officials, and Judges, each with their own unique age and service criteria.¹⁸

Section 2.3: Other Notable Public Systems

In addition to TRS and ERS, other public retirement systems exist in Texas.

• Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS): This system serves employees of various counties and districts across the state. It is unique in that retirement eligibility requirements are chosen by each individual employer from a menu of options provided by TCDRS. Generally, an employee must first become “vested” (typically after 5, 8, or 10 years of service), which grants them the right to a lifetime benefit at age 60. However, their employer’s plan may allow for earlier retirement if they meet a “Rule of 75” or “Rule of 80”.¹⁹
• Optional Retirement Program (ORP): Offered as an alternative to TRS for faculty and certain high-level administrators at Texas public universities, ORP is a defined-contribution plan.¹⁰ Unlike the defined-benefit TRS plan, retirement in ORP is not determined by a formula. Instead, it is based on when the individual decides to access the funds they have accumulated in their personal account. The timing of these withdrawals is governed primarily by IRS rules, which will be discussed in Part IV of this report.²⁰

The evolution of these Texas public pension plans reveals a clear and deliberate legislative trend.

The progressive tightening of retirement rules for newer hires in both TRS and ERS reflects a long-term policy strategy by the Texas Legislature to manage the fiscal health of these massive funds.¹²

Faced with challenges like increasing life expectancies and market volatility, the state has shifted more of the longevity and financial risk onto its more recently hired employees, while grandfathering in more generous terms for its veteran workforce.

This has created a multi-generational workforce within the same public institutions, where two colleagues performing identical jobs may face vastly different retirement timelines and benefit packages.

This dynamic has significant implications for employee morale, long-term financial planning for younger public servants, and the state’s ability to recruit and retain talent in the future.

---

Part III: The Right to Work: Mandatory Retirement and Age Discrimination Law

The decision to retire is not solely about financial eligibility; it is also about an individual’s legal right to continue working.

In Texas, as in the rest of the country, a robust legal framework exists to protect older workers from being forced out of their jobs based on age.

This framework establishes that for most people, retirement is a choice, not a mandate.

Section 3.1: Federal Protections Under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA)

The foundational law protecting older workers is the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) of 1967.

This landmark legislation makes it illegal for employers with 20 or more employees to discriminate against individuals who are age 40 or older in any aspect of employment, including hiring, firing, pay, promotions, and layoffs.²²

A direct and powerful consequence of the ADEA is the prohibition of mandatory retirement policies for the vast majority of occupations.²³

An employer cannot legally compel an employee to retire simply because they have reached a certain age, such as 65 or 70.

Any company policy that imposes such a requirement is generally unlawful.²⁶

Section 3.2: Legal Exceptions to the Ban on Mandatory Retirement

While the ban on forced retirement is broad, the ADEA includes a few very specific and narrowly construed exceptions.

Courts interpret these exceptions strictly, and the burden of proof falls on the employer to demonstrate that an exception applies.²⁸

• Bona Fide Occupational Qualification (BFOQ): This exception applies in rare situations where age is a legitimate, necessary qualification for performing a job. The BFOQ defense is typically limited to jobs where public safety is a primary concern, such as for commercial airline pilots and some public safety officers like firefighters or law enforcement.²²
• Bona Fide Executive or High Policymaking Position: This is the most relevant exception for many private-sector employers. The ADEA allows for the compulsory retirement of certain high-level employees, but only if a stringent set of criteria is met ²⁸:

1. The employee must be at least 65 years old.
2. The employee must have been employed in the bona fide executive or high policymaking role for the two-year period immediately before retirement.
3. The employee must be entitled to an immediate, non-forfeitable annual retirement benefit from the employer’s pension or similar plan that is worth at least $44,000.²⁷

The definitions for these roles are also specific.

A “bona fide executive” is typically a high-level manager who directs the work of others and has significant input on hiring and firing decisions.

A “high policymaker” is a top-level employee who may not have extensive managerial duties but plays a significant role in the development and implementation of corporate policy.²⁸

Section 3.3: Texas-Specific Retirement Laws

Texas state law generally mirrors and reinforces the protections of the federal ADEA.

The Texas Labor Code prohibits age discrimination against workers aged 40 and older and applies to private employers with at least 15 employees.²⁷

However, Texas law contains some unique provisions and exceptions that create a more complex landscape.

• The Judicial Exception: The most significant departure from the federal norm is found in the Texas Constitution itself. Article 5, Section 1-a mandates that state justices and judges must retire upon reaching the age of 75.³² This creates a state-level mandatory retirement age for a specific class of public officials.
• The Failure of Proposition 13: The public’s support for this judicial age limit was reaffirmed in the November 2023 election. Voters decisively rejected Proposition 13, a constitutional amendment that would have raised the mandatory retirement age for judges to 79.³³ The failure of this proposition ensures that several high-profile appellate judges will be forced to retire in the coming years and signals a clear public sentiment that, for this specific role, an age limit remains appropriate.³³
• The Higher Education Prohibition: In contrast to the judicial rule, Texas law provides explicit protection for tenured faculty. The Texas Education Code, Section 51.922, expressly prohibits institutions of higher education from imposing a mandatory retirement age on their tenured faculty.³⁵ This aligns Texas law with the current federal standard, which eliminated a previous temporary exemption for tenured professors in 1993.²³

This legal landscape in Texas reveals a fascinating tension.

On one hand, the law robustly defends the right of most citizens to work regardless of age, reflecting a modern understanding that chronological age is not a reliable proxy for ability or performance.

On the other hand, the state constitution carves out a specific exception for the judiciary, a position of significant public trust and cognitive demand.

The recent, overwhelming rejection of Proposition 13 demonstrates that this is not merely an archaic provision but a policy that Texas voters actively chose to preserve.

This creates a legal paradox: forcing a 75-year-old lawyer to retire would be illegal age discrimination, but requiring a 75-year-old judge to do so is a constitutional mandate.

This dichotomy suggests a nuanced public attitude that distinguishes between general employment rights and the perceived need for an age-based backstop for certain positions of ultimate public authority.

---

Part IV: Accessing Your Personal Retirement Savings

The final pillar defining retirement age relates to an individual’s access to their personal, tax-advantaged retirement accounts, such as 401(k)s and Individual Retirement Arrangements (IRAs).

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has established a set of age-based rules that govern when these funds can be withdrawn without penalty.

For many people, these rules create a de facto retirement age for accessing their largest pool of savings.

Section 4.1: Standard Withdrawal Ages for Tax-Advantaged Accounts

The most widely known IRS rule is what can be called the “Rule of 59½.” Generally, if an individual withdraws funds from a traditional IRA or a 401(k) plan before they reach age 59½, the withdrawal is considered an “early distribution.” Such distributions are typically subject to a $10\% additional tax (often called a penalty) on top of the regular income tax owed on the withdrawn amount.³⁶

This rule effectively establishes age 59½ as the baseline age for penalty-free access to one’s personal retirement savings.

While a specific employer’s plan might define a “normal retirement age” of 65 for its own administrative purposes, the age of 59½ is the key threshold for avoiding the IRS penalty.³⁶

Section 4.2: The “Rule of 55” Exception: A Critical Nuance

A significant exception to the 59½ rule is the “Rule of 55.” This IRS provision allows an individual to take penalty-free distributions from their 401(k) or 403(b) plan if they leave their job—whether by quitting, being laid off, or being fired—during or after the calendar year in which they turn 55.³⁹

While the

$10\% penalty is waived, the withdrawals are still subject to ordinary income tax.⁴¹

This rule provides valuable flexibility for those planning an early retirement, but it comes with critical limitations that are often misunderstood:

1. Timing is Paramount: The separation from service must occur in or after the calendar year the employee turns 55. An employee who leaves their job at age 54 cannot begin taking penalty-free withdrawals when they turn 55 the following year.³⁹
2. The Rule is Plan-Specific: The Rule of 55 applies only to the 401(k) or 403(b) plan of the employer the individual just left. It cannot be used to take penalty-free withdrawals from IRAs or from 401(k) plans held with previous employers.³⁹
3. The IRA Rollover Trap: This is the most significant pitfall. If an employee leaves their job and, following common financial advice, rolls their 401(k) funds into an IRA, they immediately lose the ability to use the Rule of 55. The funds are now governed by IRA rules, and penalty-free withdrawals cannot be made until age 59½.³⁹
4. Public Safety Exception: A special provision, sometimes called the “Rule of 50,” allows certain qualified public safety workers (such as police officers, firefighters, and EMTs) to take advantage of this exception beginning in the year they turn 50.³⁹

The structure of these IRS rules creates a procedural trap for the unwary early retiree.

The act of rolling over a 401(k) to an IRA is often a sound financial strategy, offering broader investment choices and account consolidation.

However, for an individual between the ages of 55 and 59½ who may need to access their funds, this standard advice can have severe, unintended consequences.

It creates a conflict between optimal investment management and practical liquidity needs.

For this specific age cohort, the decision to leave funds in a former employer’s potentially limited 401(k) plan may be the superior choice if there is any chance they will need to make withdrawals before age 59½.

Section 4.3: Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs)

At the other end of the age spectrum, federal law also compels individuals to begin withdrawing from their retirement accounts.

Under rules updated by the SECURE Act, individuals must start taking Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) from their traditional IRAs and 401(k)s beginning in the year they turn 73.³⁷

(Roth IRAs are not subject to RMDs for the original owner).

This rule effectively creates a mandatory

start age for the decumulation phase of retirement, ensuring that the government eventually collects tax revenue on these deferred funds.

---

Conclusion & Key Takeaways

The concept of “retirement age in Texas” is not a single date on a calendar but a personalized matrix of milestones determined by a variety of federal and state regulations.

There is no one-size-fits-all answer.

Instead, an individual’s retirement timeline is defined by the interplay of their birth year, employment history, and personal financial decisions.

The analysis reveals several key conclusions:

• Retirement is a Multi-Pillar Concept: True retirement readiness in Texas depends on understanding at least four systems: Social Security, applicable public pensions (like TRS or ERS), age discrimination law, and IRS rules for personal savings.
• Age is a Sliding Scale: For Social Security and Texas public pensions, eligibility and benefit amounts are not fixed but exist on a sliding scale. Claiming earlier almost always results in a permanent benefit reduction, while delaying often leads to a significant increase.
• The Right to Work is Legally Protected: With very few, narrow exceptions (most notably for Texas judges), workers age 40 and over have a federally and state-protected right to continue working and cannot be forced into retirement.
• Procedural Nuances Carry Major Financial Consequences: Seemingly minor procedural choices, such as when to enroll in Medicare or whether to roll over a 401(k) to an IRA, can have profound and often irreversible financial impacts.

To navigate this complex landscape, Texas residents should approach retirement planning with a strategic and informed mindset.

The following checklist provides a summary of the critical steps:

• [ ] Identify Your Social Security Full Retirement Age (FRA): Use your birth year to find your FRA, which is the baseline for calculating 100% of your benefit.
• [ ] Determine Your Public Pension Eligibility: If you are a public employee, identify your specific TRS, ERS, or TCDRS tier based on your hire date and service history. This will reveal your unique requirements for a full pension.
• [ ] Distinguish Pension from Health Insurance Eligibility: Never assume that being eligible for a pension automatically qualifies you for retiree health insurance (like TRS-Care). Verify the separate, and often stricter, requirements for healthcare.
• [ ] Know Your Right to Work: Understand that unless you fall into a very narrow exception (e.g., a judge, airline pilot, or bona fide executive), your employer cannot force you to retire at a specific age.
• [ ] Master the Rules of Your Personal Savings: Be aware of the 59½ rule for penalty-free withdrawals from IRAs and 401(k)s. If planning to retire between 55 and 59½, thoroughly understand the specific limitations of the “Rule of 55” before making any decisions, especially regarding IRA rollovers.

This report serves as a comprehensive educational guide.

However, given the complexity of these interlocking systems and the significance of the financial decisions involved, individuals are strongly encouraged to use this information to facilitate a productive conversation with a qualified financial advisor or tax professional who can apply these rules to their unique personal circumstances.

Works cited

1. Benefits Planner: Retirement | Retirement Age and Benefit Reduction – SSA, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.ssa.gov/benefits/retirement/planner/agereduction.html
2. Retirement Benefits – SSA, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/EN-05-10035.pdf
3. Benefits Planner: Retirement | Born in 1960 or later | SSA, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.ssa.gov/benefits/retirement/planner/1960.html
4. Guide on Taking Social Security: 62 vs. 67 vs. 70 | Charles Schwab, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.schwab.com/learn/story/guide-on-taking-social-security
5. Social Security: When to Start Drawing Benefits? | Charles Schwab, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.schwab.com/learn/story/social-security-age-chart-when-to-start-drawing-benefits
6. Benefits Planner: Retirement | Delayed Retirement Credits | SSA, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.ssa.gov/benefits/retirement/planner/delayret.html
7. 404.313. What are delayed retirement credits and how do they increase my old-age benefit amount? – SSA, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/cfr20/404/404-0313.htm
8. Delayed Retirement | Born in 1960 – SSA, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.ssa.gov/benefits/retirement/planner/1960-delay.html
9. Employment Eligible for TRS Membership | Teacher Retirement System of Texas, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.trs.texas.gov/employers/resources/eligibility
10. Teacher Retirement System | The University of Texas System, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.utsystem.edu/offices/employee-benefits/ut-retirement-program/teacher-retirement-system
11. TRS – UNT System Human Resources, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://hr.untsystem.edu/benefits/retirement-plans/trs.php
12. Teacher Retirement System | TCTA, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.tcta.org/professional-resources/publications/survival-guide/trs-survival-guide
13. Standard TRS retirement – Texas Classroom Teachers Association, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.tcta.org/professional-resources/teacher-employment/benefits/trs-retirement/standard-trs-retirement
14. Membership Tiers | Teacher Retirement System of Texas, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.trs.texas.gov/pension-benefits/know-benefits/understand-benefits/membership-tiers
15. TRS FAQs | TCTA, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.tcta.org/professional-resources/teacher-employment/benefits/trs-retirement/trs-faqs
16. Retirement Eligibility Requirements – Teacher Retirement System of Texas, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.trs.texas.gov/pension-benefits/active-member-resources/plan-retirement/retirement-eligibility-requirements
17. TRS-Care Eligibility and Enrollment | Teacher Retirement System of Texas, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.trs.texas.gov/health-benefits/retiree-health/care/eligibility
18. Retirement Eligibility | ERS, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://ers.texas.gov/active-employees/retirement/retirement-eligibility
19. Vesting and Eligibility – TCDRS, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.tcdrs.org/library/vesting-and-eligibility/
20. Retirement Program Options | Human Resources – University of Texas at Austin, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://hr.utexas.edu/current/retirement
21. TRS Benefits Handbook – UTA Faculty & Staff Resources, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://resources.uta.edu/hr/services/benefits/documents/retirement_files/archive/benefits_handbook.pdf
22. What do I need to know about … Age Discrimination, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.dol.gov/agencies/oasam/centers-offices/civil-rights-center/internal/policies/age-discrimination
23. Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 – Wikipedia, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_Discrimination_in_Employment_Act_of_1967
24. Age Discrimination | U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.eeoc.gov/age-discrimination
25. Mandatory Retirement and Labor-Force Participation of Respondents in the Retirement History Study – SSA, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/ssb/v43n11/v43n11p20.pdf
26. Forced Retirement: When Is It Age Discrimination? – Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.toddflaw.com/blog/forced-retirement-when-is-it-age-discrimination/
27. Mandatory Retirement Age | Austin Employment Discrimination Lawyer, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.wileylawyers.com/practice-areas/employment-discrimination/age-discrimination/mandatory-retirement-age/
28. “Forced Retirement” and Employers’ Obligations Under ADEA …, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.parkerpoe.com/news/2022/10/forced-retirement-and-employers-obligations-under-adea
29. 29 CFR Part 1625 — Age Discrimination in Employment Act – eCFR, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-29/subtitle-B/chapter-XIV/part-1625
30. the Age Discrimination in Employment Act – HR-Guide, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://hr-guide.com/Law/AgeDiscriminationInEmploymentAct.htm
31. Age Discrimination – Employment Law – Katz Banks Kumin, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://katzbanks.com/practice-areas/discrimination/age-discrimination/
32. Art 5 – Sec 1-a :: Texas Constitution – Justia Law, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://law.justia.com/constitution/texas/sections/cn000500-0001-a.html
33. Texas voters reject proposal to increase judges’ retirement ages …, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.texastribune.org/2023/11/07/texas-judges-retirement-proposition-results/
34. Texas Proposition 13, Increase Mandatory Retirement Age for State Judges Amendment (2023) – Ballotpedia, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://ballotpedia.org/Texas_Proposition_13,_Increase_Mandatory_Retirement_Age_for_State_Judges_Amendment_(2023)
35. Texas Education Code Section 51.922 (2024) – Mandatory Retirement Prohibited – Justia Law, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://law.justia.com/codes/texas/education-code/title-3/subtitle-a/chapter-51/subchapter-z/section-51-922/
36. Hardships, early withdrawals and loans | Internal Revenue Service, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.irs.gov/retirement-plans/hardships-early-withdrawals-and-loans
37. 401(k) withdrawal rules: How to avoid penalties – Empower, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.empower.com/the-currency/money/can-withdraw-401k-ira-penalty-free
38. Retirement plans FAQs regarding IRAs distributions (withdrawals) – IRS, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.irs.gov/retirement-plans/retirement-plans-faqs-regarding-iras-distributions-withdrawals
39. When Can You Withdraw From Your 401(k)? A Guide | Charles …, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.schwab.com/learn/story/retiring-early-5-key-points-about-rule-55
40. smartasset.com, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://smartasset.com/retirement/401k-55-rule#:~:text=Under%20the%20rule%20of%2055,earlier%2C%20at%20age%2050.)
41. Using the Rule of 55 to Take Early 401(k) Withdrawals – SmartAsset.com, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://smartasset.com/retirement/401k-55-rule
42. The rule of 55 and early 401(k) withdrawals – Britannica, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/money/what-is-401k-rule-of-55
43. What is the Rule of 55? – Fidelity Investments, accessed on August 10, 2025, https://www.fidelity.com/learning-center/personal-finance/what-is-rule-of-55