The Forgiveness Gauntlet: An In-Depth Analysis of the Biden Administration’s War on Student Debt

Introduction: Beyond the Bill – Deconstructing a Presidency’s Signature Economic Initiative

The query for a “forgiveness bill Joe Biden passed” points to a common misconception about one of the most ambitious, contentious, and legally fraught domestic policy initiatives of the modern era.

The effort to cancel student debt under the Biden administration was not the result of a single piece of legislation passed by Congress.

Instead, it has been a complex and multi-pronged campaign waged through the mechanisms of executive authority, regulatory reform, and the aggressive implementation of existing statutes.

This report provides a definitive, expert-level analysis of this campaign, deconstructing a saga defined by a bold initial promise, a formidable judicial blockade, and a strategic pivot to a more granular, programmatic battle fought on multiple fronts.

The narrative arc of student loan forgiveness under the Biden administration unfolds in five distinct acts.

It began with the Bold Promise: a campaign pledge that culminated in the August 2022 announcement of a sweeping, broad-based debt cancellation plan designed to provide relief to tens of millions of Americans.

This move was immediately met by the Judicial Wall, a series of legal challenges that ascended to the nation’s highest court, where the plan was ultimately struck down in a landmark decision that curbed the executive branch’s perceived authority.

This defeat precipitated the Strategic Pivot.

The administration shifted its focus from creating a new, singular program to maximizing relief through existing, often-neglected legal channels.

This involved overhauling dysfunctional programs like Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) and wielding the powerful Borrower Defense to Repayment authority to hold predatory institutions accountable.

The fourth act saw both Innovation and Impasse: the creation of the Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) plan, the most generous income-driven repayment program in U.S. history, which offered a new vision for managing student debt.

Yet, this innovation too was halted by a new wave of legal challenges, leaving millions of borrowers in a state of uncertainty.

Finally, the saga has entered a new phase defined by a New Reality.

The political and legal landscape has shifted, giving rise to a legislative counter-proposal—the Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP)—that signals a fundamental, and more restrictive, future for student loan repayment.

This report will navigate this complex terrain by first establishing the scale of the crisis that prompted these actions.

It will then provide a legal and policy autopsy of the failed broad cancellation plan, followed by a detailed examination of the administration’s subsequent, more successful efforts through existing programs.

The report will analyze the mechanics and implications of the new RAP framework, incorporate the profound human dimension of the debt crisis through personal narratives, and dissect the political and ideological debates that frame the issue.

It will conclude with an expert analysis of the U.S. student loan system not merely as a collection of policies, but as a piece of critical national infrastructure under immense and potentially catastrophic stress.

Section 1: Anatomy of a Crisis: The $1.8 Trillion Burden on the American Economy

To comprehend the political urgency and sheer scale of the Biden administration’s student loan initiatives, one must first grasp the magnitude of the crisis they were designed to address.

The student debt burden in the United States is not a peripheral economic issue; it is a systemic challenge of staggering proportions, affecting tens of millions of households and acting as a significant brake on national economic vitality.

The Scale of the Crisis

The aggregate numbers paint a stark picture of a financial crisis that has steadily grown for decades.

As of 2024, the total student loan debt in the United States has climbed to $1.814 trillion.¹

This figure exceeds the nation’s total credit card debt and auto loan debt, making it the second-largest category of household debt after mortgages.²

The vast majority of this debt is owed to the federal government.

The outstanding federal student loan portfolio stands at $1.661 trillion, held by approximately 42.5 million borrowers.¹

This means that roughly one in every six adult Americans is carrying federal student loan debt.⁴

The average federal student loan balance per borrower is

$39,075, while the total average balance, including private loans, can be as high as $42,673.¹

This enormous financial obligation has a direct and deleterious effect on the broader economy, with studies showing a significant negative correlation between rising student debt and the formation of new small businesses, a delay in homeownership for hundreds of thousands of young people, and a general suppression of consumer spending.⁵

Demographic Disparities and Systemic Inequity

Beyond the immense top-line figures, the student debt crisis is characterized by deep and persistent inequities that fall along racial, gender, and educational lines.

The burden is not distributed evenly; it disproportionately affects the nation’s most vulnerable populations, exacerbating existing societal disparities.

• Racial Disparities: The data on race reveals a system that not only reflects but actively amplifies the racial wealth gap. Black students are the most likely to borrow for a bachelor’s degree, with 82.9% taking on federal loans.¹ Four years after graduation, they owe an average of
  $25,000 more than their white counterparts.¹ The most damning statistic, however, illustrates a long-term systemic failure: twenty years after starting college, the median white borrower has successfully paid down 94% of their original loan balance. In stark contrast, the median Black borrower still owes
  95% of their original principal.⁸ This is not merely a reflection of different borrowing habits; it is evidence of a system where compounding interest, income disparities, and other structural factors create a debt trap that is nearly inescapable for Black Americans, actively working against intergenerational wealth creation.
• Gender Disparities: Women are also disproportionately impacted by the crisis. They hold nearly two-thirds of all outstanding student debt in the country and, on average, owe approximately $3,000 more than their male counterparts.²
• Debt by Degree Level: The crisis is not monolithic and varies significantly by the level of education pursued. While the average undergraduate at a public university borrows around $31,960 to attain their degree, a substantial portion of the total debt is driven by graduate and professional studies.¹ Graduate students, who represent only 17% of postsecondary students, account for a staggering
  47% of all federal student loans issued annually.² The average debt for a graduate degree holder can be as high as
  $102,790, with those earning professional doctorates in fields like medicine or law owing an average of $177,100.¹

This data exposes a fundamental flaw in the public narrative that often frames student debt as a problem exclusive to recent four-year college graduates.

A significant part of the crisis is concentrated among those who pursued advanced degrees, as well as a particularly vulnerable group that is often overlooked: those who took on debt but never completed their education.

Analysis shows that default rates are highest among individuals who attended for-profit institutions and those who left school without a credential.²

These borrowers are caught in the worst possible financial trap—saddled with debt but receiving none of the increased earning potential that a degree is meant to confer.

This “debt-without-degree” phenomenon counters the political argument that forgiveness exclusively benefits privileged graduates and reveals that the system’s most acute failures penalize those who attempted but did not complete their educational journey, often the most economically vulnerable students to begin with.¹²

Statistic	Value	Source(s)
Total U.S. Student Loan Debt	$1.814 Trillion	1
Total Federal Student Loan Debt	$1.661 Trillion	1
Number of Federal Borrowers	42.5 Million	1
Average Federal Balance per Borrower	$39,075	1
Average Debt for Bachelor’s Degree (Public Univ.)	$31,960	1
Average Debt for Graduate Degree	up to $102,790	1
Share of Debt Held by Women	~66%	9
Median Debt After 20 Years (White vs. Black Borrowers)	6% vs. 95% of original balance	8

Table 1: The U.S. Student Debt Crisis at a Glance.

This table consolidates the most critical statistics, grounding the report in empirical reality and highlighting the scale and inequity of the problem.

Section 2: The HEROES Act Gambit: Anatomy and Autopsy of the 2022 Broad Debt Cancellation Plan

In response to the escalating crisis, the Biden administration unveiled its most ambitious and wide-reaching proposal on August 24, 2022.

This was not a legislative “bill” passed by Congress, but a bold executive action designed to deliver on a core campaign promise and provide immediate, substantial relief to a broad swath of the American populace.

The plan’s design, legal justification, and ultimate demise in the Supreme Court represent a pivotal chapter in the ongoing debate over executive power and economic policy.

The Plan’s Architecture

The one-time debt cancellation plan was straightforward in its structure, targeting relief primarily toward low- and middle-income borrowers who had been most affected by the economic disruptions of the COVID-19 pandemic.

• Provisions: The plan called for the cancellation of up to $10,000 in federal student loan debt for all eligible borrowers. Recognizing that students from lower-income backgrounds often require more financial assistance, the plan offered up to $20,000 in cancellation for recipients of federal Pell Grants.¹⁴
• Eligibility: To ensure the relief was targeted, strict income thresholds were established. Forgiveness was available only to individuals earning less than $125,000 per year or married couples earning less than $250,000 per year.¹⁴
• Scope and Initial Implementation: The plan’s potential impact was massive. The administration estimated that over 40 million Americans would be eligible for relief. In the brief period the application was live, more than 26 million borrowers applied, and the Department of Education had already approved relief for nearly 16 million before the program was halted by court orders.¹⁵

The Legal Justification: A Novel Reading of the HEROES Act

The administration’s decision to bypass a politically divided Congress necessitated finding a legal justification within existing statutes.

The legal team chose to ground its authority in a novel and expansive interpretation of the Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students (HEROES) Act of 2003.¹⁵

Originally enacted in the wake of the September 11th attacks, the HEROES Act was designed to provide relief to military service members and other individuals affected by war or national emergencies.¹⁸

The statute grants the Secretary of Education the authority to “waive or modify any statutory or regulatory provision” applicable to federal student aid programs as deemed necessary in connection with a national emergency.

The Biden administration argued that the COVID-19 pandemic constituted such a national emergency, one that had caused widespread economic hardship.

It asserted that this authority allowed the Secretary to enact a broad debt cancellation program to ensure that borrowers were not placed in a “worse position financially” when the pandemic-era payment pause ended.¹⁵

This legal maneuver was a calculated risk.

It was not a standard legislative process but a deliberate test of the boundaries of executive power in the modern administrative state.

By using a 20-year-old law intended for a different purpose to justify a nearly half-trillion-dollar economic policy, the administration was venturing into uncharted legal territory, inviting the judicial scrutiny that would ultimately follow.

The Legal Challenge and Supreme Court’s Verdict

The plan was immediately met with a series of legal challenges.

The most significant of these was a lawsuit filed by six Republican-led states—Nebraska, Missouri, Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, and South Carolina—which argued that the President had exceeded his executive authority and that the plan would harm their states’ revenues.¹⁵

The case, Biden v.

Nebraska, quickly made its way to the Supreme Court.

On June 30, 2023, the Court issued a 6-3 decision striking down the debt cancellation plan.¹⁵

The majority opinion, authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, did not rule on the policy’s merits but on the question of executive authority.

The Court invoked the

“major questions doctrine,” a legal principle asserting that on issues of vast economic and political significance, an administrative agency must have clear, explicit, and direct authorization from Congress to act.

The Court concluded that the HEROES Act did not provide such clear authorization.

The power to “waive or modify” a program, the majority argued, could not be interpreted as the power to create a novel and fundamentally transformative mass debt cancellation program.

Such a sweeping policy, the Court reasoned, belonged to the legislative branch.

This ruling was not merely a defeat for the student loan plan; it was a landmark statement on the separation of powers, signaling a significant curtailment of executive authority and setting a new, higher bar for future administrative actions with large-scale economic implications.¹⁵

Section 3: The Administrative Pivot: Forgiveness Through Existing Legal Channels

The Supreme Court’s decision in Biden v.

Nebraska forced a fundamental strategic shift.

With the path to a single, broad-based cancellation program blocked, the administration pivoted to a new approach: maximizing forgiveness by aggressively implementing and reforming existing, often-dysfunctional, legal pathways.

This represented a move from a single, sweeping action to a multi-pronged, targeted campaign fought within the established confines of administrative law.

This effort has been remarkably successful, delivering substantial relief to millions of borrowers by making long-standing but broken government programs finally function as intended.

3.1 Reforming Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF): From 99% Failure to Mass Relief

The Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program, signed into law by President George W.

Bush in 2007, was designed with a noble purpose: to forgive the remaining federal student loan debt of public servants—such as teachers, nurses, firefighters, and nonprofit employees—after they have made 10 years of qualifying payments (120 payments in total).²¹

For over a decade, however, the program was a catastrophic failure in implementation.

Due to a labyrinth of complex rules, confusing eligibility requirements, and persistent errors by loan servicers, PSLF had a staggering

99% rejection rate prior to 2021.²⁴

Millions of dedicated public servants made payments for years, only to discover they were in the wrong type of loan or repayment plan and that none of their payments had counted.

The Biden administration tackled this administrative disaster not with new legislation, but with regulatory authority.

It implemented a “Limited PSLF Waiver,” which expired on October 31, 2022, and a subsequent, more durable “IDR Account Adjustment”.²⁵

These crucial fixes temporarily waived many of the program’s strict rules, allowing a wide range of previously non-qualifying payments to be counted toward the 120-payment threshold.

This included payments made on ineligible Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) Program loans (provided they were consolidated into Direct Loans) and credit for certain periods of deferment and forbearance that had previously been excluded.

The results of this administrative overhaul were nothing short of transformative.

The number of borrowers who had successfully received forgiveness through PSLF skyrocketed from a mere 7,000 before the administration’s reforms to over 1 million individuals.²⁴

This successful effort was not an act of creating new forgiveness, but of repairing broken government machinery to deliver on a promise that had been made to public servants more than a decade earlier.

It stands as one of the largest and most impactful components of the administration’s debt relief strategy, demonstrating that significant progress can be achieved by ensuring existing laws function as Congress originally intended.

3.2 Wielding Borrower Defense to Repayment: Accountability for Predatory Institutions

A second powerful, and previously underutilized, tool in the administration’s arsenal has been the Borrower Defense to Repayment provision.

This legal authority, which has existed in federal law since 1994, allows for the discharge of federal student loans if a college or university misled its students or engaged in other forms of misconduct in violation of the law.²⁸

For many years, the process was slow and claims were often ignored, leaving hundreds of thousands of defrauded students in limbo.³¹

The Biden administration adopted a more aggressive strategy, using its authority to approve large, group-based discharges for former students of specific institutions where widespread, systemic misconduct had been proven.

This approach bypasses the need for every individual student to file a separate, burdensome application, providing automatic relief to entire cohorts of affected borrowers.

This strategy has led to billions of dollars in automatic loan discharges for students who attended a number of now-defunct or disgraced for-profit college chains.

Major group discharges have been approved for former students of institutions including The Art Institutes ($6.1 billion for 317,000 borrowers), Ashford University ($4.5 billion for 261,000 borrowers), University of Phoenix, and Westwood College.³³

Furthermore, a landmark settlement in the

Sweet v.

Cardona class-action lawsuit is set to cancel over $6 billion in loans for approximately 200,000 borrowers who had their claims illegally delayed by the previous administration.³²

This use of Borrower Defense represents a dual-pronged effort: providing direct relief to defrauded students while simultaneously holding predatory institutions accountable for their actions.

3.3 The Rise and Stalling of the SAVE Plan: A New Vision for Income-Driven Repayment

Perhaps the most innovative element of the administration’s strategy was the creation of the Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) plan.

Rolled out in August 2023 to replace the existing REPAYE plan, SAVE was designed to be the most affordable and borrower-friendly Income-Driven Repayment (IDR) plan ever offered.³⁷

Its features directly addressed the most severe flaws of previous IDR plans:

• Higher Income Protection: SAVE dramatically increased the amount of income protected from repayment calculations. Payments are based only on income above 225% of the federal poverty line, a significant increase from the 150% threshold in most other plans. This meant that any individual earning less than approximately $32,800 per year (or a family of four earning less than $67,500) would have a $0 monthly payment.³⁷
• Lower Monthly Payments: For those required to make payments, the amount was cut in half for undergraduate loans, from 10% of discretionary income to just 5%.³⁷
• Interest Subsidy: The plan’s most revolutionary feature was its handling of interest. Under SAVE, if a borrower’s monthly payment was not enough to cover the interest accruing on their loan, the unpaid portion of the interest was waived and not added to the principal balance. This feature was designed to end the phenomenon of “negative amortization,” the psychologically crushing and financially ruinous situation where borrowers make payments for years only to see their total debt grow larger.³⁹ This attack on negative amortization was the plan’s most profound innovation, fundamentally changing the nature of the loan from a conventional debt instrument to a more manageable income-contingent obligation.
• Faster Forgiveness for Low-Balance Borrowers: The plan also provided a faster path to forgiveness for those with smaller original loan balances. Borrowers who originally took out $12,000 or less would see their remaining debt canceled after just 10 years of payments, instead of the standard 20 or 25 years.¹⁶

The SAVE plan was immediately popular, with nearly 8 million borrowers enrolling.

However, its most transformative features—particularly the interest waiver and early forgiveness provisions—made it legally vulnerable.

Opponents argued that these elements constituted another form of mass debt cancellation enacted without explicit Congressional approval, echoing the legal arguments that defeated the HEROES Act plan.⁴¹

In June 2024, federal courts in Kansas and Missouri issued injunctions blocking the full implementation of the SAVE plan.

A subsequent ruling by the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals in February 2025 upheld the injunction, effectively halting the program.¹⁶

As a result, SAVE borrowers have been placed in an administrative forbearance, and the Department of Education has announced that interest will begin accruing on their loans again starting August 1, 2025, leaving the future of this innovative program in serious doubt.⁴³

Feature	Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF)	Borrower Defense to Repayment	Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) Plan
Governing Authority	Higher Education Act of 2007; Regulatory Waivers	Higher Education Act of 1965; Federal Regulations	Higher Education Act; Federal Regulations (via Negotiated Rulemaking)
Primary Goal	Encourage careers in public service by forgiving debt after 10 years of service and payments.	Provide relief to students defrauded or misled by their schools.	Make monthly payments affordable and prevent loan balances from growing due to interest.
Eligibility Criteria	Full-time employment with a qualifying government or non-profit employer; 120 qualifying monthly payments on Direct Loans.	Proof that the school engaged in substantial misrepresentation, breach of contract, or other misconduct causing financial harm.	Most federal Direct Loan borrowers (excluding Parent PLUS loans). Payments are based on income and family size.
Forgiveness Mechanism	Forgiveness of the entire remaining loan balance after 120 qualifying payments are made.	Full discharge of federal loans related to the school’s misconduct, plus potential refunds of payments made.	Forgiveness of remaining balance after 10-25 years of payments. Unpaid interest is waived monthly.
Typical Relief	Full remaining balance after 10 years (average forgiven balance is ~$70,000).	Full discharge of loans from a specific institution (amounts vary widely).	Lowered monthly payments (often to $0) and prevention of interest capitalization.
Current Status	Active & Reformed	Active	Halted by Federal Court Injunctions

Table 2: Comparison of Key Federal Student Loan Forgiveness & Repayment Plans.

This table provides a clear, comparative overview of the distinct programs, their goals, and their current operational status.

Section 4: A New Political Reality: The Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP) and the Future of Repayment

The legal challenges that have stalled the SAVE plan have occurred within a shifting political landscape, culminating in the passage of new legislation that charts a starkly different course for the future of student loan repayment.

The Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP), created as part of the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” signed into law on July 4, 2025, represents a fundamental ideological departure from the borrower-centric protections of the SAVE plan.⁴⁶

Scheduled to become one of only two repayment options for new borrowers starting July 1, 2026, RAP signals a move away from a social safety net model and toward a framework emphasizing universal repayment obligations and personal responsibility.⁴⁸

Core Mechanics of RAP

The design of the RAP introduces several significant changes that distinguish it from all previous income-driven repayment plans:

• Payment Calculation Based on Gross Income: In the most fundamental shift, RAP calculates monthly payments based on a percentage of a borrower’s Adjusted Gross Income (AGI), not their discretionary income. This eliminates the “income protection allowance” that was a cornerstone of all prior IDR plans, which shielded a certain amount of income (e.g., 225% of the federal poverty line under SAVE) to cover basic living expenses.⁴⁸
• Graduated Payment Brackets: The percentage of AGI a borrower must pay is determined by graduated income brackets. It starts at 1% for those with an AGI between $10,001 and $20,000 and scales up incrementally, capping at 10% for those earning $100,000 or more.⁵¹
• Mandatory Minimum Payment: RAP introduces a $10 minimum monthly payment for all borrowers, including those with zero or very low income.⁵² This completely eliminates the $0 payment safety net that protected the most financially vulnerable borrowers under the SAVE plan. This feature is highly symbolic, representing a philosophical stance that every borrower must contribute something toward their debt, regardless of their financial circumstances.
• Extended Forgiveness Timeline: The time until a remaining loan balance is forgiven is extended to a flat 30 years (360 qualifying payments) for all borrowers. This is a substantial increase from the 20-25 year timeline under most previous IDR plans and the 10-year timeline for low-balance borrowers under SAVE.⁴⁹
• Interest Treatment: One feature RAP shares with the SAVE plan is a mechanism to prevent negative amortization. If a borrower’s required monthly payment does not cover the accruing interest, the unpaid interest will be waived and not added to the loan’s principal balance.⁴⁸

Implications for Borrowers

The transition from the SAVE framework to the RAP model will have profound and, for many, detrimental consequences:

• Higher Payments for Low-Income Borrowers: The elimination of the income protection threshold will cause a dramatic increase in monthly payments for the lowest-income borrowers. Under SAVE, a single person earning $30,000 a year would have a $0 monthly payment; under RAP, they would be required to pay 3% of their AGI, resulting in a significant new monthly expense.⁴⁸
• Increased Risk of Default: The combination of a mandatory minimum payment, higher overall payments for low earners, and the simultaneous elimination of economic hardship and unemployment deferments under the new law creates a much higher risk of delinquency and default. Critics argue this will push more struggling borrowers into the draconian student loan collections system.⁴⁹
• Longer Repayment Horizon: The 30-year forgiveness timeline means that many borrowers will be making payments well into their 50s and 60s. This extended period of indebtedness could significantly interfere with their ability to save for retirement and achieve long-term financial security.⁴⁹
• New Borrowing Limits: The same legislation that created RAP also imposes new annual and lifetime caps on federal student borrowing. While framed as a measure to curb over-borrowing, these limits may force students, particularly those in graduate programs, to turn to more expensive and less protected private loans to finance their education.⁴⁶

The shift from SAVE to RAP is more than a technical adjustment of formulas; it represents a deep ideological conflict over the fundamental purpose of the federal student loan program.

SAVE was designed as a form of social insurance, prioritizing borrower protection and affordability.

RAP is designed to enforce repayment and personal accountability, prioritizing the principle that a loan is a strict financial obligation that must be serviced by all.

Feature	Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) Plan	Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP)
Payment Calculation Basis	Discretionary Income	Adjusted Gross Income (AGI)
Income Protected from Calculation	225% of Federal Poverty Line (~$32,800 for a single person)	$0
Minimum Monthly Payment	$0	$10
Payment as % of Income	5% (undergrad loans) or 10% (grad loans) of income above the protected threshold.	1% to 10% of total AGI, based on income brackets.
Forgiveness Timeline	10-25 years, depending on loan balance and type.	30 years for all borrowers.
Interest Subsidy	Unpaid interest is waived monthly, preventing balance growth.	Unpaid interest is waived monthly, preventing balance growth.
Eligible Loans	Most Direct Loans (excluding Parent PLUS).	Most Direct Loans (excluding Parent PLUS).
Impact on Low-Income Borrowers	Provides a robust safety net with $0 payments for those below the income threshold.	Eliminates the safety net, requiring payments from all borrowers and increasing payments for the lowest earners.

Table 3: SAVE Plan vs. Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP): A Head-to-Head Comparison.

This table provides a stark, side-by-side comparison of the two competing repayment philosophies, illustrating the significant financial consequences of the policy shift.

Section 5: The Human Ledger: Voices from the Debt Crisis

Behind the trillions of dollars, complex legal statutes, and shifting political landscapes lies a profound human story.

The student debt crisis is not an abstract economic phenomenon; it is a lived reality that shapes the daily lives, major decisions, and emotional well-being of more than 40 million Americans.

Personal testimonials reveal both the crushing weight of this burden and the transformative power of relief, grounding the policy debate in the tangible experiences of those most affected.

The Weight of the Burden

For millions, student debt is a constant and oppressive presence, a “dark cloud” that dictates life’s possibilities.⁶⁰

The financial strain manifests in numerous ways, creating a state of suspended animation that can last for decades.

• Delayed Life Milestones: A recurring theme in borrower narratives is the postponement of fundamental life events. Individuals report delaying marriage, putting off buying a home, and choosing not to have children, or having fewer than planned, because of their debt.⁶¹ One borrower poignantly stated, “The man I love won’t marry me because of the debt we both have,” while another described their student loans as a “third mortgage” after their actual mortgage and childcare costs.⁶¹ This demonstrates that the debt doesn’t just impact individual finances; it alters the very fabric of family formation and community building.
• Career and Entrepreneurial Constraints: The debt often acts as a pair of “golden handcuffs,” trapping borrowers in jobs they might otherwise leave. The need to make a substantial monthly payment discourages risk-taking, preventing many from starting their own businesses, pursuing lower-paying but more fulfilling careers in public service, or even seeking better opportunities in a different city.⁶⁰ Dreams, as one borrower put it, begin to “look more like fantasies that will never become a reality”.⁶⁰
• Mental and Emotional Toll: The psychological burden of carrying five or six figures of debt for decades is immense. Borrowers describe a “never-ending cycle” of payments that barely touch the principal, leading to feelings of hopelessness and shame.⁶⁰ The “crippling stress and anxiety” is a constant companion, a weight that informs every financial decision, from grocery shopping to retirement planning.⁶⁷
• Daily Hardship: For many, the struggle is more immediate. The high monthly payments force them to live paycheck-to-paycheck, making it impossible to save for emergencies, invest for the future, or even afford basic necessities like quality food and housing.⁶¹

These stories reveal a critical dimension of the crisis often missed in economic analyses: the “time tax.” Beyond the direct financial cost, student debt imposes a significant opportunity cost by consuming years, and sometimes decades, of a borrower’s life.

It holds them in a state of financial precarity, preventing them from making the long-term investments in their careers, families, and communities that are essential for both personal well-being and national economic growth.

Forgiveness, when it comes, is not just a financial transaction; it is the act of returning a future that was held hostage by debt.

The Transformative Power of Forgiveness

The emotional counterpoint to the burden of debt is the profound relief experienced by those who have received forgiveness.

Their stories illustrate the life-altering impact of being unburdened, unlocking human and economic potential that had been suppressed for years.

• Financial Liberation: The most immediate impact is financial. Testimonials are filled with the joy of being able to finally buy a house, save for their children’s college education so they won’t repeat the cycle, or simply have “breathing room” in their monthly budget.⁶⁷ “My debt to income ratio is way lower now,” one borrower celebrated. “I now can buy a house by myself I’m so happy”.⁶⁷ For another, who had over $91,000 forgiven, the reaction was pure elation: “I screamed. I gave praises. I joyfully danced half-dressed in my living room”.⁷¹
• Career and Life Freedom: Forgiveness often acts as a key, unlocking new possibilities. People report quitting jobs where they felt trapped, doubling their income by moving into private practice, starting their own mental health businesses, and even fulfilling a lifelong dream of moving to another country.⁶⁷ It provides the freedom to align their work with their passions, rather than solely with the need to service a massive debt.
• Psychological Relief: Perhaps the most consistently reported outcome is the immense psychological relief. The end of the “constant stress and worry” is a recurring theme.⁶⁷ The disappearance of the “crippling stress and anxiety knowing I’d never be able to pay off my debt,” as one individual described it, “is enough for me”.⁶⁷ This mental liberation allows people to focus on their health, their families, and their futures in a way that was previously impossible.

These narratives powerfully demonstrate that debt cancellation is more than a balance sheet adjustment.

It is an infusion of hope and opportunity that can fundamentally change the trajectory of a person’s life, with cascading positive effects on their families, communities, and the broader economy.

Section 6: The Political Battlefield: Ideology, Fairness, and the Framing of Forgiveness

The debate over student loan forgiveness is one of the most polarized and ideologically charged issues in contemporary American politics.

The discourse extends far beyond economic models and budget scores, touching upon deeply held national values regarding personal responsibility, fairness, and the role of government.

Understanding the political framing of the issue is essential to comprehending the legislative gridlock and the sharp pendulum swings in executive policy.

Arguments for Forgiveness

Proponents of widespread student debt cancellation advance a case built on pillars of economic stimulus, social equity, and systemic correction.

• Economic Stimulus: The primary economic argument is that forgiveness acts as a powerful stimulant. By freeing up tens of millions of households from monthly payments, it increases disposable income that can be channeled into consumer spending, home buying, and small business formation. This, in turn, boosts GDP, creates jobs, and fosters a more dynamic economy.⁵
• Racial and Gender Equity: A core social justice argument frames forgiveness as a necessary tool to address systemic inequities. Given that the debt burden falls most heavily on Black and female borrowers, proponents argue that cancellation is a direct and impactful way to help close the racial and gender wealth gaps.⁵
• Correcting a Broken System: Many advocates maintain that the current student loan system is fundamentally broken and predatory. They argue that forgiveness is not a “handout” but a necessary correction for decades of policy failures, including declining public investment in higher education, insufficient consumer protections, and the rise of for-profit colleges that leave students with worthless degrees and massive debt.⁶

Arguments Against Forgiveness

Opponents of forgiveness mount a powerful counter-narrative grounded in principles of fairness, fiscal responsibility, and individual accountability.

• Fairness and Personal Responsibility: The most resonant argument against forgiveness centers on fairness. Critics contend that it is fundamentally unfair to taxpayers who never attended college, to families who sacrificed and saved to pay for tuition out-of-pocket, and especially to borrowers who diligently paid off their loans. This is often framed as a “slap in the face” to responsible citizens, penalizing those who honored their financial commitments.⁵
• Regressive Policy: A key economic critique is that broad forgiveness is a regressive policy that disproportionately benefits higher-income earners. Because individuals with graduate and professional degrees (e.g., doctors, lawyers) hold a large share of the total debt, critics argue that cancellation effectively transfers wealth from working-class taxpayers to a relatively privileged, highly-educated elite.⁵
• Inflationary and Costly: The sheer cost of broad forgiveness—estimated at around $400 billion for the Biden administration’s initial plan—is a central concern for fiscal conservatives. They argue that such a massive expenditure would be borne by taxpayers and could fuel inflation by injecting hundreds of billions of dollars into the economy.⁶
• Moral Hazard: Opponents also warn of “moral hazard”—the idea that forgiving current debt could incentivize future students to borrow more recklessly under the assumption that their loans will also be forgiven. This, they argue, would do nothing to solve the root cause of the crisis—skyrocketing college costs—and could even exacerbate it.¹²

Public Opinion

Polling data reflects this deep national divide.

While there is significant support for some form of relief, the public is far from united on a single approach.

An Ipsos/USA Today poll from May 2023 found that a plurality of Americans (47%) supported the Biden administration’s targeted, income-capped proposal.

However, support dropped significantly for universal forgiveness with no income limits (29% support).⁷⁶

The data reveals a strong public appetite for addressing the root causes of the crisis, with broad, bipartisan majorities supporting measures to make college more affordable for future students (70% agree) and to provide two years of tuition-free community college (64% support).⁷⁶

Furthermore, a strong majority of voters, including a majority of Republicans, oppose efforts to eliminate income-driven repayment plans like SAVE, indicating a desire for a functional safety net even among those who oppose broad cancellation.⁷⁷

The political discourse surrounding this issue is often less a debate about policy specifics and more a proxy war over the concept of “deservingness” in American society.

Opponents have proven highly effective at framing the issue through a lens of cultural resentment, painting borrowers as “slacker baristas” or students pursuing frivolous degrees in “lesbian dance theory”.¹³

This rhetoric is designed to trigger a powerful psychological phenomenon known as “sucker aversion”—the visceral anger people feel when they perceive that someone else is getting an unfair advantage or “getting away with something”.²⁰

By framing forgiveness as a bailout for an undeserving elite at the expense of the hardworking, responsible taxpayer, this narrative transforms a complex economic issue into a potent cultural wedge, making bipartisan compromise exceptionally difficult.

Section 7: Conclusion: A System Under Stress – Diagnosis and Prognosis for America’s Financial Aid Infrastructure

The tumultuous saga of student loan forgiveness under the Biden administration—from the ambitious HEROES Act plan to the administrative overhaul of PSLF and the legal battles over the SAVE plan—is more than a series of policy debates.

It is a symptom of a much deeper, more systemic problem.

The U.S. federal student loan system, a $1.6 trillion financial behemoth upon which millions of Americans depend, should be understood not as a collection of programs, but as a piece of critical national infrastructure.

And by nearly every measure, that infrastructure is failing.

The crisis is not merely about the aggregate amount of debt; it is about the crumbling administrative, legal, and operational architecture that is supposed to manage it.

The endless cycle of borrower confusion, administrative backlogs, and policy whiplash is not a series of isolated incidents but evidence of a systemic breakdown.

Reframing the issue from a “debt problem” to an “infrastructure failure” provides a more accurate diagnosis and a clearer path toward sustainable, long-term solutions.

Evidence of a System in Collapse

The structural weaknesses of the student loan system are pervasive and manifest in several critical areas:

• Administrative Overload and Incompetence: The Office of Federal Student Aid (FSA), the agency within the Department of Education responsible for managing the entire system, is chronically underfunded and overwhelmed.⁷⁸ The disastrously botched rollout of the simplified FAFSA form in 2024, which caused massive delays and chaos for millions of students and families, is a clear indicator of an administrative apparatus that lacks the resources and capacity to perform its most basic functions, let alone implement complex new initiatives like the SAVE plan.⁷⁸
• Pervasive Servicer Failures: The system’s reliance on a network of private loan servicers has created a chasm between borrowers and the federal relief programs they are legally entitled to. Annual reports from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) document persistent and systemic failures by these servicers, including inaccurate billing statements, erroneous payment processing, providing misleading information about repayment options, and creating “customer service doom loops” that cause direct financial harm to millions.⁸⁰ Borrowers report waiting an average of eight months for servicers to resolve issues, wasting countless hours navigating a broken system.⁸¹
• Destabilizing Policy Whiplash: The constant oscillation of policy—from the pandemic payment pause, to the promise of broad cancellation, to its reversal, to the launch of SAVE, to its legal halt, and now to the looming implementation of RAP—has created a state of profound instability and confusion for 42.5 million borrowers.⁸⁴ This political and legal volatility makes it impossible for individuals to engage in long-term financial planning and erodes public trust in the government’s ability to manage the system competently.
• Misaligned Incentives and Lack of Accountability: The infrastructure is built on a foundation of misaligned incentives. The wide availability of federal loans with few underwriting standards encourages colleges and universities to continuously raise tuition, knowing that federal dollars will cover the increase.⁸⁵ The system simultaneously fails to hold low-performing and predatory institutions accountable for poor student outcomes, such as low graduation rates and high default rates. This leads to what economists call “malinvestment,” where taxpayer dollars fund educational programs that leave students financially worse off than when they started.¹¹

Prognosis for the Future

The current trajectory points toward a deepening of the crisis.

The legislative shift toward the Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP), combined with proposals to drastically cut staffing at the Department of Education and other agencies, signals a move toward a more punitive and less supportive system—one that prioritizes repayment over borrower protection.⁷⁸

The underlying drivers of the crisis—the skyrocketing cost of higher education and the decades-long decline in direct public investment that has shifted the cost burden onto individuals—remain fundamentally unaddressed.³

Without a serious, bipartisan commitment to overhauling the underlying infrastructure of federal financial aid, the cycle of rising debt, widespread default, administrative chaos, and bitter political battles is destined to continue.

A lasting solution requires moving beyond the binary debate over forgiveness and focusing on rebuilding the system itself.

This would involve streamlining the bewildering array of repayment options, ensuring adequate and stable funding for the Office of Federal Student Aid, establishing rigorous oversight and accountability for loan servicers, and addressing the root causes of tuition inflation.

Until then, the student loan system will remain a crumbling pillar of America’s economic infrastructure, and the dream of higher education will, for millions, continue to be overshadowed by the nightmare of debt.

Works cited

1. Student Loan Debt Statistics [2025]: Average + Total Debt, accessed August 12, 2025, https://educationdata.org/student-loan-debt-statistics
2. 10 Key Facts about Student Debt in the United States – Peterson Foundation, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.pgpf.org/article/10-key-facts-about-student-debt-in-the-united-states/
3. Causes, History & Solutions to the Student Debt Crisis – The Annie E. Casey Foundation, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.aecf.org/blog/solutions-to-the-student-debt-crisis-in-a-time-of-economic-distress
4. A Snapshot of Federal Student Loan Debt – Congress.gov, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF10158
5. Student Loan Debt | Pros, Cons, Debate, Arguments, Education …, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/procon/student-loan-debt-debate
6. Student Loan Forgiveness: The Current Debate – Michigan Journal of Economics, accessed August 12, 2025, https://sites.lsa.umich.edu/mje/2023/04/24/student-loan-forgiveness-the-current-debate/
7. The Effect of Student Debt on Consumption: A State-Level Analysis – FDIC, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.fdic.gov/media/168631
8. Stalling Dreams: How Student Debt is Disrupting Life Chances and Widening the Racial Wealth Gap – The Heller School, accessed August 12, 2025, https://heller.brandeis.edu/iere/pdfs/racial-wealth-equity/racial-wealth-gap/stallingdreams-how-student-debt-is-disrupting-lifechances.pdf
9. Ten Reasons to Cancel Student Loan Debt – ERIC, accessed August 12, 2025, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED610484.pdf
10. The real story of student debt | Urban Institute, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.urban.org/urban-wire/real-story-student-debt
11. What Went Wrong with Federal Student Loans? – American Economic Association, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.38.3.209
12. THE INEQUITY OF STUDENT LOAN FORGIVENESS – Republican Policy Committee | – House.gov, accessed August 12, 2025, https://republicanpolicy.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicanpolicy.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/the-inequity-of-student-loan-forgiveness-update-v.3.pdf
13. Deservingness and the Politics of Student Debt Relief – Cambridge University Press, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/perspectives-on-politics/article/deservingness-and-the-politics-of-student-debt-relief/5311E590BF749F560CA438E563A765CB
14. The Biden Administration’s Student Loan Debt Relief Plan | Claremont McKenna College, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.cmc.edu/financial-aid/tools-and-resources/biden-administrations-student-loan-debt-relief-plan
15. Student Debt Relief Deep Dive: A Look at The Biden … – NASFAA, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.nasfaa.org/news-item/34741/Student_Debt_Relief_Deep_Dive_A_Look_at_The_Biden_Administration_s_Efforts_and_Obstacles
16. Biden Administration Debt Relief Timeline – nasfaa, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.nasfaa.org/uploads/documents/Biden_Administration_Debt_Relief_Timeline.pdf
17. Student Loan Forgiveness: A Timeline of Events – Paradigm Advisors, accessed August 12, 2025, https://paradigmadvisors.com/insights/student-loan-forgiveness-a-timeline-of-events
18. The Media’s Slanted Coverage of Biden’s Student Loan Forgiveness Plan – American Enterprise Institute, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/The-Medias-Slanted-Coverage-of-Bidens-Student-Loan-Forgiveness-Plan.pdf?x91208
19. Federal Student Loan Debt Relief in the Context of COVID-19 | Congress.gov, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R46314
20. Why Student Loan Forgiveness Makes People Boiling Mad, accessed August 12, 2025, https://slate.com/human-interest/2023/03/student-loan-forgiveness-supreme-court-decision.html
21. Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) Help Tool – Federal Student Aid, accessed August 12, 2025, https://studentaid.gov/pslf/
22. Public Service Loan Forgiveness | Federal Student Aid, accessed August 12, 2025, https://studentaid.gov/manage-loans/forgiveness-cancellation/public-service
23. Student Loan Forgiveness – Federal Student Aid, accessed August 12, 2025, https://studentaid.gov/manage-loans/forgiveness-cancellation
24. Despite collapse of his forgiveness plan, millions had student loans canceled under Biden, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/despite-collapse-of-his-forgiveness-plan-millions-had-student-loans-canceled-under-biden
25. Student Loans: A Timeline of Actions Taken in Light of the COVID-19 Pandemic, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF12136
26. Timeline: Federal Student Loans During the COVID-19 Pandemic, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.americanprogress.org/article/timeline-federal-student-loans-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/
27. Statement from President Joe Biden on Approving Student Debt Cancellation for Over 5 Million Americans, accessed August 12, 2025, https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2025/01/13/statement-from-president-joe-biden-on-approving-student-debt-cancellation-for-over-5-million-americans/
28. Forgiveness and Discharge – Nelnet – Federal Student Aid, accessed August 12, 2025, https://nelnet.studentaid.gov/content/forgivenessanddischarge
29. Borrower Defense Loan Discharge | Federal Student Aid, accessed August 12, 2025, https://studentaid.gov/manage-loans/forgiveness-cancellation/borrower-defense
30. Borrower Defense: Meaning and Application – Investopedia, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/what-is-borrower-defense-5214746
31. WHAT TO KNOW ABOUT BORROWER DEFENSE TO REPAYMENT – The Institute for College Access & Success, accessed August 12, 2025, https://ticas.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/What-to-Know-About-Borrower-Defense-to-Repayment-rule_TICAS.pdf
32. Landmark Borrower Defense Settlement to Cancel Over $6 Billion in Student Loans for … – Project on Predatory Student Lending, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.ppsl.org/news/news/press-releases/landmark-borrower-defense-settlement-to-cancel-over-6-billion-in-student-loans-for-200000-borrowers-release
33. Borrower Defense Updates – Federal Student Aid, accessed August 12, 2025, https://studentaid.gov/announcements-events/borrower-defense-update
34. The Department of Education has announced more borrower defense findings; which applications are getting granted?, accessed August 12, 2025, https://studentloanborrowerassistance.org/the-department-of-education-has-announced-more-borrower-defense-findings-which-applications-are-getting-granted/
35. University of Phoenix Settlement | Federal Trade Commission, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/refunds/university-phoenix-settlement
36. FAQs for Sweet v. McMahon – Project on Predatory Student Lending, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.ppsl.org/sweet-v-mcmahon-class-members
37. What Is the SAVE Plan for Student Loans? – NerdWallet, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.nerdwallet.com/article/loans/student-loans/the-new-idr-plan
38. SAVE Plan – nasfaa, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.nasfaa.org/save_plan
39. FAQ SAVE PLAN – afscme, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.afscme.org/member-resources/downloadable-asset/FAQ%20-%20SAVE%20plan.pdf
40. All You Need to Know About the SAVE Student Loan Plan, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.studentloanprofessor.com/save-student-loan-plan/
41. The Assault on the SAVE Plan Has Brought Student Debt Relief to a Crossroads, accessed August 12, 2025, https://tcf.org/content/commentary/the-assault-on-the-save-plan-has-brought-student-debt-relief-to-a-crossroads/
42. Issue Brief: The Benefits of SAVE | CEA – Biden White House Archives, accessed August 12, 2025, https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/cea/written-materials/2024/02/21/issue-brief-the-benefits-of-save/
43. U.S. Department of Education Continues to Improve Federal Student Loan Repayment Options, Addresses Illegal Biden Administration Actions, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.ed.gov/about/news/press-release/us-department-of-education-continues-improve-federal-student-loan-repayment-options-addresses-illegal-biden-administration-actions
44. Explained: Trump’s student loan reset—how interest resumes, what it costs SAVE borrowers, and what RAP will change in 2026, accessed August 12, 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/education/news/explained-trumps-student-loan-resethow-interest-resumes-what-it-costs-save-borrowers-and-what-rap-will-change-in-2026/articleshow/123117718.cms
45. IDR Plan Court Actions: Impact on Borrowers – Federal Student Aid, accessed August 12, 2025, https://studentaid.gov/announcements-events/idr-court-actions
46. Trump signs ‘One Big Beautiful Bill Act,’ students react to loan adjustments and limits – The Vanderbilt Hustler, accessed August 12, 2025, https://vanderbilthustler.com/2025/08/04/trump-signs-one-big-beautiful-bill-act-students-react-to-loan-adjustments-and-limits/
47. SAVE vs RAP: What Trump’s “Big Beautiful” student loan bill really means for you | Earnest, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.earnest.com/blog/trump-student-loan-bill-forgiveness-changes
48. Big Bill Means Big Changes For Student Loan Borrowers: What You Need to Know, accessed August 12, 2025, https://studentloanborrowerassistance.org/big-bill-means-big-changes-for-student-loan-borrowers-what-you-need-to-know/
49. Student Loan Update: Warning Issued Over Trump’s New Plan – Newsweek, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.newsweek.com/student-loan-update-warning-issued-over-trumps-new-plan-2112027
50. What Is the New Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP) for Student Loans? – NerdWallet, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.nerdwallet.com/article/loans/student-loans/what-is-the-new-repayment-assistance-plan-rap-for-student-loans
51. Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP) Explained: Forgiveness, Payments & More, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.studentloanplanner.com/repayment-assistance-plan-rap/
52. Explained: How Trump’s RAP rips up student debt rules; bigger bills, gutted aid, a brutal new reality for borrowers, accessed August 12, 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/education/news/explained-how-trumps-rap-rips-up-student-debt-rules-bigger-bills-gutted-aid-a-brutal-new-reality-for-borrowers/articleshow/123118276.cms
53. How the Reconciliation Law Changes the Federal Student Loan Repayment System, accessed August 12, 2025, https://ticas.org/affordability-2/reconciliation-2025-student-loans/
54. What Is the Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP)? How It Will Change Student Loan Payments, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.savingforcollege.com/article/student-loan-repayment-assistance-plan-rap
55. Preliminary Economic Analysis of Senate Proposal on Student Loan Repayment – Student Borrower Protection Center, accessed August 12, 2025, https://protectborrowers.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Economic-Analysis-of-Senate-HELP-Recon-Framework-6_10.pdf
56. Minimum payments in income driven repayment plans – Brookings Institution, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/minimum-payments-in-income-driven-repayment-plans/
57. How the US student loan ‘cliff effect’ could add years and tens of thousands to your repayments, accessed August 12, 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/education/news/how-the-us-student-loan-cliff-effect-could-add-years-and-tens-of-thousands-to-your-repayments/articleshow/123213563.cms
58. Effect of Changes to Title IV of the Higher Education Act in the One Big Beautiful Bill, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.ropesgray.com/en/insights/alerts/2025/08/effect-of-changes-to-title-iv-of-the-higher-education-act-in-the-one-big-beautiful-bill
59. Warren, Sanders, Schumer, Lawmakers Press Private Student Loan Lenders on Plans for Borrowers After Republicans Slash Access to Federal Loans – Elizabeth Warren, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.warren.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/warren-sanders-schumer-lawmakers-press-private-student-loan-lenders-on-plans-for-borrowers-after-republicans-slash-access-to-federal-loans
60. I have dreams, but with student debt they’re just fantasies – Alliance for Youth Action, accessed August 12, 2025, https://allianceforyouthaction.org/i-have-dreams-but-with-student-debt-theyre-just-fantasies/
61. Student Debt Stories – NAACP, accessed August 12, 2025, https://naacp.org/student-debt-stories
62. The Weight of Student Debt: Amari’s Story – NAACP, accessed August 12, 2025, https://naacp.org/articles/weight-student-debt-amaris-story
63. The Impact of Student Debt on the Daily Lives of Young Americans, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.theccic.org/Customer-Content/www/CMS/files/CAP/SALT/Life_Delayed_2015.pdf
64. The Debt Devil: After 23 Years I’m Finally Free from Student Loans – Joel Ballezza, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.joelballezza.com/blog/2021/3/2/the-debt-devil-after-23-im-finally-free-from-student-debt
65. Unburdened: How Canceling Student Debt Can Boost Growth, Equity, and Innovation – The Roosevelt Institute, accessed August 12, 2025, https://rooseveltinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/RI_UnburdenedCancellingStudentDebt_FactSheet_202101.pdf
66. Real Stories of Unmanageable Debt – Aspen Institute, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.aspeninstitute.org/blog-posts/real-stories-of-unmanageable-debt/
67. It’s been just about a year since I received forgiveness… : r/PSLF – Reddit, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/PSLF/comments/1eprl1w/its_been_just_about_a_year_since_i_received/
68. Debt Takes a Toll – Harvard Law School Center on the Legal Profession, accessed August 12, 2025, https://clp.law.harvard.edu/article/debt-takes-a-toll/
69. How will your life change for the better once your forgiveness happens? : r/PSLF – Reddit, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/PSLF/comments/ynkq1r/how_will_your_life_change_for_the_better_once/
70. MEA members share stories of student loan debt relief with U.S. Ed Secretary: ‘For me, it was life-changing’ – Michigan Education Association, accessed August 12, 2025, https://mea.org/mea-members-share-stories-of-student-loan-debt-relief-with-u-s-ed-secretary-for-me-it-was-life-changing/
71. My $91513 student loan FORGIVENESS story! – Congress Heights on the Rise, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.congressheightsontherise.com/blog/my-91513-student-loan-forgiveness-story
72. How Earning PSLF Changed My Life – Equal Justice Works, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.equaljusticeworks.org/news/how-earning-pslf-changed-my-life/
73. How We All Benefit From Student Debt Relief – Time Magazine, accessed August 12, 2025, https://time.com/6258489/student-loan-relief-benefits-supreme-court-decision/
74. The Impact of Canceling Student Debt – Investopedia, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/the-impact-of-cancelling-student-debt-5101053
75. US student loan forgiveness at risk as Trump limits PSLF eligibility: Everything borrowers need to know, accessed August 12, 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/education/news/us-student-loan-forgiveness-at-risk-as-trump-limits-pslf-eligibility-everything-borrowers-need-to-know/articleshow/123205994.cms
76. Support for student loan forgiveness varies across different amounts – Ipsos, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/support-student-loan-forgiveness-varies-across-different-amounts
77. NEW POLL: Overwhelming, Bipartisan Majority Reject Cuts to the Student Loan Safety Net and Financial Aid Students and Families Rely On, accessed August 12, 2025, https://protectborrowers.org/new-poll-overwhelming-bipartisan-majority-reject-cuts-to-the-student-loan-safety-net-and-financial-aid/
78. How Gutting the U.S. Department of Education Would Hurt Students and Their Families, accessed August 12, 2025, https://tcf.org/content/commentary/how-gutting-the-u-s-department-of-education-would-hurt-students-and-their-families/
79. Stagnant Funding Has Broken the Office of Federal Student Aid and Failed Students, accessed August 12, 2025, https://tcf.org/content/commentary/stagnant-funding-has-broken-the-office-of-federal-student-aid-failed-students/
80. Annual Report of the CFPB Student Loan Ombudsman, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.consumerfinance.gov/data-research/research-reports/annual-report-of-the-cfpb-student-loan-ombudsman-2024/
81. CFPB Report Details Student Borrower Harms from Servicing Failures and Program Disruptions, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.consumerfinance.gov/about-us/newsroom/cfpb-report-details-student-borrower-harms-from-servicing-failures-and-program-disruptions/
82. Missed Payments, Broken Systems: Federal Studies Detail Student Loan Quagmire, accessed August 12, 2025, https://thefinancialbrand.com/news/banking-trends-strategies/missed-payments-broken-systems-federal-studies-detail-student-loan-quagmire-183059
83. Administrative Burden in Federal Student Loan Repayment, and Socially Stratified Access to Income-Driven Repayment Plans | RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.rsfjournal.org/content/9/4/86
84. Student Loan Default: How Policy and Politics Are Failing Borrowers, accessed August 12, 2025, https://bipartisanpolicy.org/blog/student-loan-default-how-policy-and-politics-are-failing-borrowers/
85. Who’s Responsible for the U.S. Student Loan Debt Crisis | Edvisors, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.edvisors.com/blog/contributors-to-student-loan-debt-crisis/
86. Ending Federal Student Loans: There Is a Small Window of Opportunity to Get the Government out of Student Lending | Cato Institute, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.cato.org/briefing-paper/ending-federal-student-loans
87. An Analysis of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act’s Effect on Student Loans, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.aei.org/research-products/report/an-analysis-of-the-one-big-beautiful-bill-acts-effect-on-student-loans/
88. Student Loan System Failure is Inevitable with Transfer to Small Business Administration, Putting Millions at Risk, accessed August 12, 2025, https://ticas.org/media/student-loan-system-failure-is-inevitable-with-transfer-to-small-business-administration-putting-millions-at-risk/
89. Jayapal, Sanders Introduce Legislation to Address Student Debt Crisis, accessed August 12, 2025, https://jayapal.house.gov/2023/06/14/jayapal-sanders-introduce-legislation-to-address-student-debt-crisis/